Servertest

Nordtorp wrote:

Can any of yoy get above 15-17 fps? And what about the UI controller... Can't finish the first job... I have cultivated 100%

Middleclaw wrote:

Do you think we have not already?

I got the inkling that those who are havng problems are AMD CPU users Whilst those that are not having problems are uing Intel CPU's. It is not the first time that this has happened.

Koala wrote:

Vorrrace wrote:

Koala wrote:

Okay, you have got to be kidding. I have backed this project in the hope that for once Linux users wouldn't be second class but rather equal to Windows users. How is this going to continue? Will Linux users have to wait for new versions even when Windows users can already play them? Will Linux support always be a lower priority than support for Windows?

Okay, if it were a day that we'd have to wait, I'd be okay. We've been waiting for a while now with no indication that Windows would be the sole platform to receive this first version that I have been looking for all this time. But now you're telling me that it will be released "later". Seriously? Not even the roughest of ETAs? You're just going to give us "later" to go on?

I'm going to have to wonder how well the game is ever going to run on Linux as well. Obviously, the size of the part of the development team is much smaller than that which is concerned with Windows. There is no reason to assume that there will be significantly less bugs and other problems on Linux than on Windows, yet there don't seem to be close to as many resources allotted to Linux development.

This is incredibly disappointing. You may have made me angry, but most of all you have utterly disappointed my expectations in you.

They cannot develop many platforms at once with such a small team. Unfortunately, as a Linux user, you know better than anyone that you'll never be priority because majority of people use Windows. Don't want to sound mean but... the only person you should be angry at is yourself.

There wouldn't be any problem if the fact that the portion of the development team that indeed is capable of Linux support and the fact that Windows would be prioritized would have been disclosed right from the moment it was apparent. There is no reason I should be angry at myself for believing in a team of developers that set out to best the currently leading game on farming simulation when one of the features they're going to beat it with is Linux support.
Once again: If you disclose information that is detrimental for your backers -- your supporters, the people who invested their money in you -- as soon as it is apparent, you did all you could and you're fine. Leave your supporters in the dark and you messed up.

Koala wrote:

Vorrrace wrote:

Koala wrote:

Okay, you have got to be kidding. I have backed this project in the hope that for once Linux users wouldn't be second class but rather equal to Windows users. How is this going to continue? Will Linux users have to wait for new versions even when Windows users can already play them? Will Linux support always be a lower priority than support for Windows?

Okay, if it were a day that we'd have to wait, I'd be okay. We've been waiting for a while now with no indication that Windows would be the sole platform to receive this first version that I have been looking for all this time. But now you're telling me that it will be released "later". Seriously? Not even the roughest of ETAs? You're just going to give us "later" to go on?

I'm going to have to wonder how well the game is ever going to run on Linux as well. Obviously, the size of the part of the development team is much smaller than that which is concerned with Windows. There is no reason to assume that there will be significantly less bugs and other problems on Linux than on Windows, yet there don't seem to be close to as many resources allotted to Linux development.

This is incredibly disappointing. You may have made me angry, but most of all you have utterly disappointed my expectations in you.

They cannot develop many platforms at once with such a small team. Unfortunately, as a Linux user, you know better than anyone that you'll never be priority because majority of people use Windows. Don't want to sound mean but... the only person you should be angry at is yourself.

There wouldn't be any problem if the fact that the portion of the development team that indeed is capable of Linux support and the fact that Windows would be prioritized would have been disclosed right from the moment it was apparent. There is no reason I should be angry at myself for believing in a team of developers that set out to best the currently leading game on farming simulation when one of the features they're going to beat it with is Linux support.
Once again: If you disclose information that is detrimental for your backers -- your supporters, the people who invested their money in you -- as soon as it is apparent, you did all you could and you're fine. Leave your supporters in the dark and you messed up.

Vorrrace wrote:

Koala wrote:

Vorrrace wrote:

Koala wrote:

Okay, you have got to be kidding. I have backed this project in the hope that for once Linux users wouldn't be second class but rather equal to Windows users. How is this going to continue? Will Linux users have to wait for new versions even when Windows users can already play them? Will Linux support always be a lower priority than support for Windows?

Okay, if it were a day that we'd have to wait, I'd be okay. We've been waiting for a while now with no indication that Windows would be the sole platform to receive this first version that I have been looking for all this time. But now you're telling me that it will be released "later". Seriously? Not even the roughest of ETAs? You're just going to give us "later" to go on?

I'm going to have to wonder how well the game is ever going to run on Linux as well. Obviously, the size of the part of the development team is much smaller than that which is concerned with Windows. There is no reason to assume that there will be significantly less bugs and other problems on Linux than on Windows, yet there don't seem to be close to as many resources allotted to Linux development.

This is incredibly disappointing. You may have made me angry, but most of all you have utterly disappointed my expectations in you.

They cannot develop many platforms at once with such a small team. Unfortunately, as a Linux user, you know better than anyone that you'll never be priority because majority of people use Windows. Don't want to sound mean but... the only person you should be angry at is yourself.

There wouldn't be any problem if the fact that the portion of the development team that indeed is capable of Linux support and the fact that Windows would be prioritized would have been disclosed right from the moment it was apparent. There is no reason I should be angry at myself for believing in a team of developers that set out to best the currently leading game on farming simulation when one of the features they're going to beat it with is Linux support.Once again: If you disclose information that is detrimental for your backers -- your supporters, the people who invested their money in you -- as soon as it is apparent, you did all you could and you're fine. Leave your supporters in the dark and you messed up.

Was it stated clearly somewhere that both version would be released exactly at once? If yes, show me? If not, then "expecting it" was a mistake from you.I mean, you should be happy that they even care about Linux. Most of devs those days won't even pay attention to a platform that is almost used by no one... especially when it comes to gaming... Making games take time and people... it's not easy nor free.. they have to start somewhere.. Windows is by far the best thing to do first because almost everyone is on Windows. on 10'000 backers, maybe 10 are on Linux...

Denut wrote:

test not good at this time ...

config

dual xeon e5-2670v1 2.6ghz low and turbo 3ghz on all cores (16) 3.3ghz on 2 cores per cpu (4)
32gb ram
980gtx 4gb
ssd 500gb
lasted nvidia driver 382.53


game settings to minimum


multi screen setup with 5 screens (only 1 to play the other to display other programs)..and (tested with all other screen deactivated)

with my other screen activated when i scroll with the mouse wheel to change zoom in the game my other screen with google chrome (for example) scroll up and down (some times on the screen 2 3 4 or 5 assuming 1 is the game screen)


result maybe 5 or 10 fps max 15

Koala wrote:

Vorrrace wrote:

Koala wrote:

Vorrrace wrote:

Koala wrote:

Okay, you have got to be kidding. I have backed this project in the hope that for once Linux users wouldn't be second class but rather equal to Windows users. How is this going to continue? Will Linux users have to wait for new versions even when Windows users can already play them? Will Linux support always be a lower priority than support for Windows?

Okay, if it were a day that we'd have to wait, I'd be okay. We've been waiting for a while now with no indication that Windows would be the sole platform to receive this first version that I have been looking for all this time. But now you're telling me that it will be released "later". Seriously? Not even the roughest of ETAs? You're just going to give us "later" to go on?

I'm going to have to wonder how well the game is ever going to run on Linux as well. Obviously, the size of the part of the development team is much smaller than that which is concerned with Windows. There is no reason to assume that there will be significantly less bugs and other problems on Linux than on Windows, yet there don't seem to be close to as many resources allotted to Linux development.

This is incredibly disappointing. You may have made me angry, but most of all you have utterly disappointed my expectations in you.

They cannot develop many platforms at once with such a small team. Unfortunately, as a Linux user, you know better than anyone that you'll never be priority because majority of people use Windows. Don't want to sound mean but... the only person you should be angry at is yourself.

There wouldn't be any problem if the fact that the portion of the development team that indeed is capable of Linux support and the fact that Windows would be prioritized would have been disclosed right from the moment it was apparent. There is no reason I should be angry at myself for believing in a team of developers that set out to best the currently leading game on farming simulation when one of the features they're going to beat it with is Linux support.Once again: If you disclose information that is detrimental for your backers -- your supporters, the people who invested their money in you -- as soon as it is apparent, you did all you could and you're fine. Leave your supporters in the dark and you messed up.

Was it stated clearly somewhere that both version would be released exactly at once? If yes, show me? If not, then "expecting it" was a mistake from you.I mean, you should be happy that they even care about Linux. Most of devs those days won't even pay attention to a platform that is almost used by no one... especially when it comes to gaming... Making games take time and people... it's not easy nor free.. they have to start somewhere.. Windows is by far the best thing to do first because almost everyone is on Windows. on 10'000 backers, maybe 10 are on Linux...

First off: please try and refrain from made up statistics that are very likely nowhere near reality. I don't have patience for polemics.
Secondly, imagine this: A movie is set to release worldwide. You buy your tickets, knowing that the release date will not be definite for a while, but you're okay with it. Then, you receive the news that the movie will be released a little over a week later. Just that news. You plan ahead so you can watch the movie and look forward to it even more.
The day arrives, you wait all day to get home and finally head to the cinema, and when you arrive, the cashier tells you: Nah, the movie has only been released in the rest of the world. You can view it later.
Tell me that you'd be angry at yourself. And if you do, please don't expect an answer from me since I will not continue a discussion with another party that has departed from reality.

Denut wrote:

you right but how to send it to devs

Vorrrace wrote:

Denut wrote:

you right but how to send it to devs

I'm not sure how they plan to gather feedbacks and bug report. Do we have to post in support forum or? I'm not sure. But it's obvious it's compatiblity issue.

showgunn84 wrote:

I am running all amd and not able to get higher than 15-20 fps. just wondering if anybody else is having issues with framerates. maybe ill try installing game on hdd and see if my ssd is the problem.

Ryzen 7 1700
RX480
16gb ram
120gb ssd
2tb hdd

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

I am running all amd and not able to get higher than 15-20 fps. just wondering if anybody else is having issues with framerates. maybe ill try installing game on hdd and see if my ssd is the problem.

Ryzen 7 1700
RX480
16gb ram
120gb ssd
2tb hdd

Did you try to reduce the settings. Since they game is not fully optimized that could be the problem

showgunn84 wrote:

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

I am running all amd and not able to get higher than 15-20 fps. just wondering if anybody else is having issues with framerates. maybe ill try installing game on hdd and see if my ssd is the problem.

Ryzen 7 1700
RX480
16gb ram
120gb ssd
2tb hdd

Did you try to reduce the settings. Since they game is not fully optimized that could be the problem

Tried messing with the settings, but didn't really seem to make a difference. Also tried different resolutions that my monitor supports and still had bad performance. I'm installing on my other amd fx8350 + rx 460 build to see if I get the same or better performance

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

I am running all amd and not able to get higher than 15-20 fps. just wondering if anybody else is having issues with framerates. maybe ill try installing game on hdd and see if my ssd is the problem.

Ryzen 7 1700
RX480
16gb ram
120gb ssd
2tb hdd

Did you try to reduce the settings. Since they game is not fully optimized that could be the problem

Tried messing with the settings, but didn't really seem to make a difference. Also tried different resolutions that my monitor supports and still had bad performance. I'm installing on my other amd fx8350 + rx 460 build to see if I get the same or better performance

Cool also not sure are you using the latest graphics drivers. Hope the game works on your other build

showgunn84 wrote:

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

I am running all amd and not able to get higher than 15-20 fps. just wondering if anybody else is having issues with framerates. maybe ill try installing game on hdd and see if my ssd is the problem.

Ryzen 7 1700
RX480
16gb ram
120gb ssd
2tb hdd

Did you try to reduce the settings. Since they game is not fully optimized that could be the problem

Tried messing with the settings, but didn't really seem to make a difference. Also tried different resolutions that my monitor supports and still had bad performance. I'm installing on my other amd fx8350 + rx 460 build to see if I get the same or better performance

Cool also not sure are you using the latest graphics drivers. Hope the game works on your other build

just got done messing around with it on fx 8350 build, had to have all settings as low as they could go or off in order to get above 20fps and boy does it look ugly, not sure what the issue is and graphics drivers are up to date with latest. But they do have a lot of optimization left to do so ill waite to play again till they release an update and see if that makes any difference.

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

jpglazar wrote:

showgunn84 wrote:

I am running all amd and not able to get higher than 15-20 fps. just wondering if anybody else is having issues with framerates. maybe ill try installing game on hdd and see if my ssd is the problem.

Ryzen 7 1700
RX480
16gb ram
120gb ssd
2tb hdd

Did you try to reduce the settings. Since they game is not fully optimized that could be the problem

Tried messing with the settings, but didn't really seem to make a difference. Also tried different resolutions that my monitor supports and still had bad performance. I'm installing on my other amd fx8350 + rx 460 build to see if I get the same or better performance

Cool also not sure are you using the latest graphics drivers. Hope the game works on your other build

just got done messing around with it on fx 8350 build, had to have all settings as low as they could go or off in order to get above 20fps and boy does it look ugly, not sure what the issue is and graphics drivers are up to date with latest. But they do have a lot of optimization left to do so ill waite to play again till they release an update and see if that makes any difference.

Yeah they have lots of work, i think it best you wait since your video card might currenly be the issue. Also could be many different issue and really hard to track down. Hope you can enjoy the game I have a kind of older computer and it runs OK but not perfect since i do encounter some hicups
I have I7 3770 with 32 GB Ram and Geforce 1070 but I do have faith they will fix the issues